Cases 11 - 20 of 1,924
Hernandez et al v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Justin A. Hernandez, Carlos Mondragon, Javier Sanchez and others
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU Lucero, FNU Rosenbaucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. Wilkins et al
as 1:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
George Maldonado
Defendant:
FNU Wilkins, Jacob LNU and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deweese v. McDonald
as 5:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
George Deweese
Defendant:
Ralph McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Konecny v. The Big M Casino, et al
as 24-1090
Plaintiff:
J. ALAN KONECNY, AKA Alan J. Konecny
Defendant:
THE BIG M CASINO, GEORGE FREELAND, DANA GOODELL and others
Roper (PS) v. Santini
as 1:2024cv01113
Plaintiff:
John Roper
Defendant:
George Santini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tsosie v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Evander Tsosie
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Ruben Quintana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Morgan et al v. Biden
as 5:2024cv00264
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan, Kirk Brogie, Ernest Draper and others
Respondent:
Joseph Biden and David Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Benson v. Thomas et al
as 1:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Regan Benson
Defendant:
Ron Thomas, Mark Fleecs, Jason Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Webb
as 24-4043
Plaintiff:
DAVID WEBB
Defendant:
MICHAEL CALDWELL, Ogden City Mayor, MARK JOHNSON, Ogden City Chief Administrator, JAY LOWDER, Ogden City Public Service Director and others
Bryant v. Stevenson
as 2:2024cv00099
Petitioner:
George C Bryant
Respondent:
Warden Stevenson, FNU Stevenson and Attorney General State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
