Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Cressman v. Thompson, et al
as 12-6151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH CRESSMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL C. THOMPSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of Safety and Security and as the Commissioner of Public Safety for the State of Oklahoma, PAULA ALLEN, individually and in her official capacity as Licensing Services Hearing Officer for the Oklahoma Department of Public Safety, THOMAS KEMP, JR., in his official capacity as Chairman of the Oklahoma Tax Commision and others
Cressman v. Thompson et al
as 5:2011cv01290
Plaintiff:
Keith Cressman
Defendant:
Michael C Thompson and Paula Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Smokoff et al
as 2:2010cv01075
Plaintiff:
Michael Hobbs Thompson
Defendant:
Jeanett F. Smokoff, Rodger Brockbank, Jr., Bob Workman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Parker
as 10-6167
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL PAT THOMPSON
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID PARKER
Thompson v. Parker et al
as 5:2009cv01136
Petitioner:
Michael Pat Thompson
Respondent:
David Parker and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank National Association et al
as 2:2008cv00325
Plaintiff:
Michael Ryan Thompson, Michael Ryan Thompson, Michael Ryan Thompson and others
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank National Association, Eric Wheeler, Timothy Beckstrand and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-5165
Debtor - Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00600
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
