Cases 11 - 20 of 168
In re: Norton
as 23-4037
Petitioner:
LONNIE NORTON
Respondent:
FNU COLES, FNU ALLRED, FNU LEMMON and others
Norton v. Coles, et al
as 23-4004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIE NORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU COLES, FNU ALLRED, FNU LEMMON and others
Norton v. Parsons, et al
as 23-4006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIE NORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL PARSONS, DANNY WHITE, F. MCNIELL and others
Norton v. Cooly et al
as 4:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Norton
Defendant:
FNU Cooly and FNU Bergener
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plentyhoops v. Rolff et al
as 1:2022cv02720
Plaintiff:
Tori J Plentyhoops and Tori Plentyhoops
Defendant:
Jonathan Rolff, Tim Norton, Tim (I) Norton and others
Jones et al v. USA
as 2:2022mc00683
Plaintiff:
Debra Jones and Arden C. Post
Petitioner:
Keith Campbell and Vance Norton
Defendant:
USA
Poer, et al v. Dickey, et al
as 22-1222
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHERRY POER, as Administratrix of the Estate of Christopher Poer, deceased, GAVIN POER, as surviving child of deceased and MCKENZIE POER, as surviving child of deceased
Defendant / Appellant:
DEPUTY CHRIS DICKEY, in his individual capacity and SERGEANT TRAVIS TURNER, in his individual capacity
Defendant:
SHERIFF TIM NORTON, in his official capacity and THE CITY OF COMMERCE CITY
Torrence v. Peterson
as 22-3045
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES MELVIN TORRENCE
Respondent / Appellee:
HAZEL PETERSON, Warden, Norton Correctional Facility
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Norton v. Jane Phillips Memorial Medical Center, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00566
Plaintiff:
Genele Norton
Defendant:
Jane Phillips Memorial Medical Center, Inc., St. John Health System, Inc. and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
