Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Thomas v. Whitten et al
as 5:2021cv00417
Defendant:
Rick Whitten and NFCC
Plaintiff:
Paul E Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Helix Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00484
Defendant:
Andrew Schweibold, Satyavrat Joshi, Paul E. Hodges and others
Plaintiff:
Taylor Robinson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 10
Anderson v. Helix Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00464
Defendant:
Andrew Schweibold, Satyavrat Joshi, Paul E. Hodges and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Anderson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Merritts v. Spirit Aerosystems Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00280
Defendant:
Ronald T Kadish, Stephen Anthony Cambone, John Gilson and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Merrits and Richard Merritts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wind v. United States Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv01113
Defendant:
Kate Knowles, Matthew Newcomer, James McKenzie and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Carl Wind, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deborah Breuner Davis et al v. FBI et al
as 1:2019cv03258
Plaintiff:
Deborah Breuner Davis and Deborah C Davis Trust
Defendant:
James B Comey, Dana J Boente, Robert S Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
E. et al v. California Physicians Service
as 2:2019cv00415
Plaintiff:
Paul E., Heather E. and L. E.
Defendant:
California Physicians Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Harner et al v. Modern Custom Fabrication, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02157
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Harner
Defendant:
Modern Custom Fabrication, Inc. and Weir Minerals North America
In_re:
Molycorp Minerals, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Thomas v. United States of America
as 5:2017cv00721
Movant:
Paul E Thomas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Knopf v. Williams, et al
as 17-8025
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PAUL E. KNOPF
Defendant - Appellant:
KENT WILLIAMS, in his individual capacity
Defendant:
EVANSTON, WYOMING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
