Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Goodrich v. Richardson
as 5:2011cv03206
Petitioner:
Lonnie Goodrich
Respondent:
Shelton Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hardin v. Richardson
as 5:2011cv03180
Petitioner:
Denny-Ray Hardin
Respondent:
Shelton Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smalls v. Richardson et al
as 5:2011cv03150
Plaintiff:
Anthony Maurice Smalls
Defendant:
Shelton Richardson and J. Michael Stouffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Hartley et al
as 5:2011cv03105
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Stevens
Defendant:
Diana Hartley and Shelton Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smalls v. Stermer, et al
as 11-3113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY MAURICE SMALLS
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT P. STERMER, Assistant Trustee, Department of Justice, Office of the Federal Detention Trustee, in his individual and official capacity, D. T. HININGER, Representative, Corrections Corporation of America, in his individual and official capacity, STEVEN CONRY, Representative, Corrections Corporation of America, in his individual and official capacity and others
Stevens v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 5:2010cv03224
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Stevens
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Shelton Richardson, James Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Green v. Richardson et al
as 5:2010cv03207
Petitioner:
Robert E. Green
Respondent:
Shelton Richardson and United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Richardson et al
as 5:2010cv03044
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Warner Jones
Defendant:
Shelton Richardson and Correctional Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Smalls v. Stermer et al
as 5:2010cv03025
Plaintiff:
Anthony Maurice Smalls
Defendant:
Scott P. Stermer, D. T. Hininger, Steven Conry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
