Cases 11 - 20 of 136
Cosby v. Warden ADX, et al
as 22-1407
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby, AKA Gregory D. Cosmo Cosby
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN ADX, WARDEN USP HIGH, COMPLAX AW (PROGRAMS) and others
Cosby v. ADX et al
as 1:2022cv02531
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Cosby, Gregory D Crosby and Gregory D. Cosmo Cosby
Defendant:
ADX, USP HGH, Complex AW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harlin v. USP Leavenworth
as 5:2022cv03129
Plaintiff:
Damon A. Harlin, Jr.
Defendant:
USP Leavenworth, Donald Hudson, Jason Troll and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bautista v. USP Leavenworth Medical Staff
as 5:2022cv03065
Plaintiff:
Ismael Cobos Bautista
Defendant:
USP Leavenworth Medical Staff, (fnu) Hudson, Jane Doe (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Perry v. Florence USP
as 1:2022cv00689
Plaintiff:
Gareth Lorenzo Perry
Defendant:
Florence USP, Lovett, Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quiah v. USP Florence
as 1:2022cv00675
Plaintiff:
Wade Quiah
Defendant:
USP Florence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Team Romeo, et al
as 22-1011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIE ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN/JANE DOE, Director Western Regional Office of the BOP, JOHN/JANE DOE, Designation Center D.S.C.C. "Team Romeo", MRS. DUBOIS, Unit Manager USP Florence and others
Garner v. Warden, USP-Leavenworth
as 21-3167
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANK J. GARNER, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, USP-LEAVENWORTH
Johnson v. Hudson
as 21-3141
Petitioner / Appellant:
DERRICK JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
DONALD HUDSON, Warden, USP - Leavenworth
Davis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv02103
Plaintiff:
Raynard Davis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, USP Victorville Medical Department, Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
