Cases 211 - 220 of 413
Perez v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections Director et al
as 5:2014cv01271
Petitioner:
Panfilo Perez
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections Director and Janet Dowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roland v. Oklahoma Correctional Industries et al
as 5:2014cv01182
Plaintiff:
John Roland
Defendant:
Oklahoma Correctional Industries, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Jerry Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ali v. Jones et al
as 5:2014cv01174
Plaintiff:
Murtaza Ali
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Ed Evans, Robert Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spratt v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2014cv00636
Plaintiff:
David L Spratt
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Robert Patton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Patton et al
as 5:2014cv01131
Plaintiff:
John Winfry Moore
Defendant:
Robert Patton and Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cathey v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv01036
Petitioner:
William Reeves Cathey
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Mindy Cunningham, Richard Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Thompson v. Fallin et al
as 5:2014cv00946
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Thompson
Defendant:
Mary Fallin and Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv00735
Plaintiff:
James P Ray, Sr
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Janet Dowling and Katryna Frech
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camren v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2014cv00361
Plaintiff:
Dennis K Camren
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma , Oklahoma Department of Corrections , Ottawa County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
