Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Dencer et al
as 5:2014cv01134
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Kenneth Dencer, Kenneth Dencer as Officer, Director, Shareholder and/or principal of Man Cave Restaurants LLC doing business as Man Cave The, Anton Atansov Trifonov and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown et al v. Woolly et al
as 6:2014cv00397
Plaintiff:
Sarah Brown and Jason Nixon
Defendant:
Brice Woolly, Anthony Manning, Kevin Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manning v. Evans
as 4:2013cv00722
Petitioner:
Patrick Wayne Manning, II
Respondent:
Edward Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Manning v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2013cv00990
Petitioner:
Patrick Wayne Manning, II
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McJunkin Red Man Corporation v. T Rowe Pipe LLC
as 5:2013cv00779
Plaintiff:
McJunkin Red Man Corporation
Defendant:
T Rowe Pipe LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Manning v. Lester et al
as 5:2013cv00150
Plaintiff:
Johnathan J Manning
Defendant:
Joe Lester, Carrie Davis, R Casy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv00514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bryant et al v. Quibids, LLC. et al
as 5:2012cv00134
Plaintiff:
Theresa Bryant , Jill Manning , Susan Snyder and others
Defendant:
QuiBids LLC , Quibids Holdings LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Manning v. USA
as 4:2010cv00680
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Patrick Wayne Manning, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Austin et al v. A.W. Chesteron Co., Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv00015
Plaintiff:
Nora Austin, Nora Austin and Hank Austin
Defendant:
A.W. Chesteron Co., Inc., Able Supply Co., Action Supply Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
