Cases 21 - 30 of 264
Clark v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00533
Petitioner:
David George Clark
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Churchill v. Clark
as 6:2023cv00412
Plaintiff:
Zechariah Michael Gilbert Chruchill and Zechariah Michael Gilbert Churchill
Defendant:
Bradley Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Johnson v. Facebook et al
as 4:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Defendant:
Facebook, Meta, Rudy Giuliani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Clark v. Cole et al
as 5:2023cv00774
Plaintiff:
Anthony Raymone Clark
Defendant:
FNU Cole and Kevin Stitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cys v. Cook et al
as 6:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
David Christopher Cys
Defendant:
FNU Cook, Dr. Patchin and FNU Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meadows v. City of Oklahoma City et al
as 5:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Cortez N. Meadows
Defendant:
City of Oklahoma City, Kassidy White, Nathan Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richter v. Nelson et al
as 4:2020cv00167
Defendant:
Denise Armstrong, Lesli Blazer, Cynthia Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan D Richter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garrett v. Anderson et al
as 6:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Marvin Garrett
Defendant:
Jennifer M. Anderson, Errol R. Arthur, Julie Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
