Cases 21 - 30 of 5,514
People of the State of Colorado (PS) et al v. Democratic Party of Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv01097
Plaintiff:
People of the State of Colorado and Kurt Overturf
Defendant:
Democratic Party of Colorado, National (US) Democratic Party, Dominion Voting Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DeWilde v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2024cv00084
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives Director, Merrick Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Jake Stanley DeWilde
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Manuel-Ramirez v. Garland
as 24-9526
Petitioner:
CARLOS MANUEL-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Maes, et al v. Polis, et al
as 24-1157
Plaintiff:
MOURAD KARIM MAES and JOHN ALLEN RICKS
Defendant:
JARED POLIS, Governor of the State of Colorado, PHILIP J. WEISER, Attorney General, JAY SUTHERLAND GRANT, Denver Disrict Court Judge and others
Arredondo v. Rios et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Petitioner:
Sergio Arredondo
Respondent:
H. Rios and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Brewer
as 24-5046
Petitioner:
RENEL BREWER
Respondent:
GENTNER F DRUMMOND, Attorney General of Oklahoma
Ricks, et al v. Polis, et al
as 24-1148
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALLEN RICKS and MOURAD KARIM MAES
Defendant:
JARED POLIS, Governor of the State of Colorado, PHILIP J. WEISER, Attorney General, JAY SUTHERLAND GRANT, Denver Disrict Court Judge and others
Ramos, et al v. Garland
as 24-9524
Petitioner:
MODESTA RAMOS RAMOS, A.M.R.R. and J.A.R.R.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Simkins v. Fairbairn, et al
as 24-1140
Plaintiff:
WILLIE J. SIMKINS
Respondent:
MARK FAIRBAIRN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
