Cases 21 - 30 of 1,673
Serna, et al v. City of Colorado Springs, et al
as 24-1149
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO SERNA and AJHALEI SNODDY
Defendant:
CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, WYNETTA MASSEY, DARLENE KENNEDY and others
Loudermill v. Hoskins
as 2:2024cv02127
Plaintiff:
Denton Eugene Loudermill, Jr.
Defendant:
Denny L. Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dees (PS) et al v. Hood et al
as 1:2024cv00848
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Dees and Ethan D. Smith
Defendant:
William Hood, Alexis King, Christopher Zenisek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gottorff (PS) v. State of Colorado, The et al
as 1:2024cv00831
Plaintiff:
David J Gottorff
Defendant:
State of Colorado, The, Kurt Beckenhauer, Sean Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grayson (PS) v. Adams County Jail
as 1:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dennis Grayson
Defendant:
Adams County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. Gonzalez
as 24-6050
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DENNIS EMERSON GONZALEZ
Livingston v. Regalado et al
as 4:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Aaron J Livingston also known as Aaron J Clarke doing business as Gtwo, Aaron J Clarke, Aaron J Livingston also known as Clarke doing business as Gtwo and others
Defendant:
Vic Regalado, Tulsa County Sheriff's Office, Jared Daniel Bakker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leadership Institute et al v. Stokes et al
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Leadership Institute and Turning Point USA
Defendant:
Garnett Stokes, Joseph Silva, Timothy Stump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mundt v. Gadziala, et al
as 24-1041
Plaintiff:
DENNIS MUNDT, individually and as next friend and parent of D.J.M., a minor child
Defendant:
CAMILLE GADZIALA and JOI JOHNSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
