Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Duarte v. USA
as 2:2011cv00297
Petitioner:
Francisco Duarte
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Quezada-Duarte v. Holder, Jr.
as 10-9565
Petitioner:
RAMERO QUEZADA-DUARTE
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General
United States v. Snyder
as 09-2312
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERTO DUARTE SNYDER
Duarte v. PPG Industries, Inc.
as 6:2009cv01366
Plaintiff:
Stephen J. Duarte and Stephen J. Duarte
Defendant:
PPG Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Medrano-Duarte v. USA
as 6:2009cv01189
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Miguel Medrano-Duarte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Duarte v. Metro Narcotics Agency/Task Force, et al
as 1:2008cv00612
Plaintiff:
Manuel Duarte and Manuel Duarte
Defendant:
Metro Narcotics Agency/Task Force, Dona Ana County, Todd Garrison and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Duarte v. Bear Transportation Solutions, LLC et al
as 6:2008cv01128
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Duarte
Defendant:
Bear Transportation Solutions, LLC, Bear Transportation, Inc., Bear Transportation Services, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Briones et al v. JNS Construction Services, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv00461
Plaintiff:
Mario Facundo Borrego Briones, Jesus Alberto Marines Carreon, Raul Rios Solis and others
Defendant:
JNS Construction Services, LLC, John Herzer, Midwest Drywall Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
United States v. Duarte-Hurtado
as 08-2021
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EFREN DUARTE-HURTADO
Duarte v. Clement et al
as 2:2007cv00689
Plaintiff:
Rosa Duarte
Defendant:
Paul D. Clement, United States Department of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
