Cases 21 - 26 of 26
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., et al v. Sebelius, et al
as 13-6215
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID GREEN, MART GREEN, STEVE GREEN and others
Defendant - Appellant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
Amicus Curiae:
SENATOR DANIEL COATS, SENATOR THAD COCHRAN, SENATOR MIKE CRAPO and others
Morrow v. Hobby Lobby Stores Inc et al
as 5:2013cv00472
Plaintiff:
Eleanor Morrow
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores Inc and Ader Janitorial Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Arnold v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada et al
as 5:2013cv04041
Plaintiff:
Claudia Arnold
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada and Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hobby Lobby Stores, et al v. Sebelius, et al
as 12-6294
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOBBY LOBBY STORES, INC., MARDEL, INC., DAVID GREEN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, HILDA SOLIS, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor and others
Hobby Lobby Stores Inc et al v. Sebelius et al
as 5:2012cv01000
Plaintiff:
Hobby Lobby Stores Inc , Mardel Inc , David Green and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius , United States Department of Health and Human Services , Hilda Solis and others
Amicu:
Orrin G Hatch , Daniel R Coats , Thad Cochran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hobby Lobby Stores Inc v. Cancer Care Associates
as 5:2007cv01351
Plaintiff:
Hobby Lobby Stores Inc
Defendant:
Cancer Care Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
