Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 26 of 26
McKeighan v. Corrections Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-3286
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES A. MCKEIGHAN
Defendant - Appellee: CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, MIKE SHUTE, United States Marshal's Office, in his individual and official capacity, FREDRICK LAWRENCE, previous Warden, CCA-Leavenworth, in his individual and official capacity and others
Roy v. Chili's of Kansas, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02565
Plaintiff: Georgia Roy
Defendant: Chili's of Kansas, Inc. and Faultless Laundry Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McKeighan v. Corrections Corp. of America, et al
as 09-3178
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES A. MCKEIGHAN
Defendant - Appellee: CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, TERRA MOREHEAD, Assistant United States Attorney, in her individual and official capacity, MIKE SHUTE, United States Marshal's Office, in his individual and official capacity and others
LSF5 US Loan Pool, II, LLC v. Westridge Apartments, Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv02712
Plaintiff: LSF5 US Loan Pool, II, LLC and LSF5 US Loan Pool, II, LLC
Defendant: Westridge Apartments, Ltd. and Automatic Laundry Company, Ltd.
ThirdParty Plaintiff: (3rd Party) Westridge Apartments, Ltd. and (3rd Party) Westridge Apartments, Ltd.
ThirdParty Defendant: Steve Preston and Steve Preston
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Contract None
Young v. Martinez, et al
as 08-1098
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOEY YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee: RICHARD MARTINEZ, Head of Maintences [sic] and ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., Head of Laundry Services
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00927
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?