Cases 21 - 30 of 36
New Mexico Consolidated Construction, LLC v. City of Santa Fe et al
as 1:2012cv00513
Plaintiff:
New Mexico Consolidated Construction, LLC
Defendant:
City Council of the City of Santa Fe , Rebecca Wurzberger , Patti J. Bushee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Toney v. Roberts et al
as 5:2009cv03250
Petitioner:
Michael M. Toney
Respondent:
Ray Roberts and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin et al v. American Fidelity Assurance Company et al
as 5:2009cv01212
Plaintiff:
Michael M Griffin and Michael M Griffin
Defendant:
American Fidelity Assurance Company and Allsup Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Morgan v. Crage
as 5:2009cv00673
Plaintiff:
Michele E Morgan
Defendant:
Michael M Crage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Mitchell v. No Defendants Named
as 1:2009cv01205
Plaintiff:
Michael M. Mitchell
Defendant:
No Defendants Named
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Miller v. United States of America et al
as 2:2008cv00740
Plaintiff:
Michael M. Miller and Michael M. Miller
Defendant:
United States of America, William Scott Hongell, Steve Wood and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
