Cases 21 - 30 of 31
U. S. Specialty Insurance Company v. Earley, Jr. et al
as 1:2015cv01590
Plaintiff:
U. S. Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
John Charles Earley, Jr. and Michael William Schlarb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ford v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2015cv00354
Plaintiff:
Michael William Ford
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Walstead v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv02425
Plaintiff:
Michael William Walstead
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Syngenta Seeds, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. McCoy
as 14-4149
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL WILLIAM MCCOY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
United States v. Pitter
as 12-3009
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CURTIS PITTER, AKA Peter, AKA Michael Francois, AKA Michael Williams, AKA Martin Trevor Mario, AKA Joseph Stephenson Calv Melrose, AKA Peter Paterson, AKA Paule Blake, AKA Stepheson Calvin Melrose Joseph
Gunin v. Nickhols et al
as 1:2011cv01388
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Gunin
Defendant:
Dana Nickhols and Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv04051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
