Cases 21 - 30 of 271
In re: Norton
as 23-4037
Petitioner:
LONNIE NORTON
Respondent:
FNU COLES, FNU ALLRED, FNU LEMMON and others
Tungsten Parts Wyoming v. Omanoff, et al
as 23-8018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TUNGSTEN PARTS WYOMING, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
DENNIS OMANOFF, GEORGE PAZOS, GLOBAL TUNGSTEN AND POWDERS CORP. and others
Norton v. Coles, et al
as 23-4004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIE NORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU COLES, FNU ALLRED, FNU LEMMON and others
Riley v. Talented Ghostwriter et al
as 1:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Leigh Riley
Defendant:
Talented Ghostwriter, 360 Digital Marketing LLC, Retrocube LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Glendenning et al
as 4:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
Melissa Glendenning and Riley Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Riley (ID 52926) v. Skidmore et al
as 5:2022cv03185
Plaintiff:
Martin Arnold Riley
Defendant:
(fnu) Skidmore, (fnu) Hopkins, (fnu) East and others
Interested Party:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lunsford v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
Deana Lunsford and Douglas Rucker
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Joshua Hyman, Cody Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riley v. USA et al
as 1:2022cv01525
Plaintiff:
Jared Riley
Defendant:
USA, C. Carter, William Resto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor et al v. Riley
as 5:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
Tory Taylor and Sommer Franklin
Defendant:
Bobby Don Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle
Riley v. The GoodYear Tire and Rubber Company
as 5:2022cv00357
Plaintiff:
Tasha Riley
Defendant:
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Pursuant to the Family Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
