Cases 21 - 30 of 271
Amaro Cisneros v. Peacock et al
as 1:2023cv00835
Plaintiff:
Tandy Amaro Cisneros
Defendant:
Denise Peacock, David Gilbert, Hillary Gurney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. Talented Ghostwriter et al
as 1:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Leigh Riley
Defendant:
Talented Ghostwriter, 360 Digital Marketing LLC, Retrocube LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
In re: Norton
as 23-4037
Petitioner:
LONNIE NORTON
Respondent:
FNU COLES, FNU ALLRED, FNU LEMMON and others
Norton v. Coles, et al
as 23-4004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIE NORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU COLES, FNU ALLRED, FNU LEMMON and others
Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Glendenning et al
as 4:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
Melissa Glendenning and Riley Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Riley (ID 52926) v. Skidmore et al
as 5:2022cv03185
Plaintiff:
Martin Arnold Riley
Defendant:
(fnu) Skidmore, (fnu) Hopkins, (fnu) East and others
Interested Party:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lunsford v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
Deana Lunsford and Douglas Rucker
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Joshua Hyman, Cody Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Shaughnessy v. Young Living Essential Oils, LC et al
as 2:2020cv00470
Defendant:
Jared Turner, Benjamin Riley, Mary Young and others
Plaintiff:
Julie O'Shaughnessy
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Riley v. USA et al
as 1:2022cv01525
Plaintiff:
Jared Riley
Defendant:
USA, C. Carter, William Resto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor et al v. Riley
as 5:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
Tory Taylor and Sommer Franklin
Defendant:
Bobby Don Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
