Cases 21 - 30 of 953
Meoli v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03061
Plaintiff:
Michael R Meoli
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc., Fidelity Investments, Inc., Kristina Baca and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Reams v. Landstar Ranger, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03005
Plaintiff:
ZACHARTY T REAMS and Zachary T. Reams
Defendant:
Landstar Ranger, Inc. and SAUL ALMERAZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pace (PS) v. Prose et al
as 1:2023cv02847
Plaintiff:
Christopher Pace
Defendant:
Susan Prose, Lewis Babcock and Scott T. Varholak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ingmire (PS) v. Vital Core et al
as 1:2023cv02842
Plaintiff:
Chad T. Ingmire
Defendant:
Vital Core and Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coit (PS) v. Stencil et al
as 1:2023cv02835
Plaintiff:
Jill Coit
Defendant:
Andre Stencil, Jared Polis, Randolph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bertolo (PS) v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv02763
Defendant:
Sean Burrows, Dean Williams, Andre Moses Stancil and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Bertolo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia (PS) v. Ensey et al
as 1:2023cv02755
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Garcia
Defendant:
Ensey, Polis, Philip J. Weiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia (PS) v. Ensey et al
as 1:2023cv02737
Petitioner:
Kenneth L. Garcia
Respondent:
Ensey, Polis, Phil J Weiser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baskerville (PS) v. Wilkendorf et al
as 1:2023cv02641
Plaintiff:
Destinie Basanville and Destinie Baskerville
Defendant:
C. Wilkendorf, T. Arntson and John Kellner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Labor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
