Cases 31 - 40 of 6,570
Delano (PS) v. Hansen et al
as 1:2024cv01428
Petitioner:
Delano Medina and Medina Delano
Respondent:
Jennifer Hansen and Attorney General for the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clements v. Rios et al
as 2:2024cv00486
Petitioner:
James Clements
Respondent:
Hector Rios and Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nava-Capilla v. Garland
as 24-9534
Petitioner:
ANTONIO NAVA-CAPILLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Hernandez-Romero v. Garland
as 24-9535
Petitioner:
JOSE DANIEL HERNANDEZ-ROMERO
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General
Hume (PS) v. Attorney General et al
as 1:2024cv01410
Plaintiff:
Coalin Joshua Hume
Defendant:
Attorney General, People of the State of Colorado, The and Clerk of Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ogden v. Turner, et al
as 24-2079
Petitioner:
KEVIN K. OGDEN
Respondent:
NEIL TURNER, Warden, GUADALUPE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Burnham (PS) v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv01397
Petitioner:
Arthur Burnham
Respondent:
State of Colorado and Attorney General for the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortega et al v. Lujan Grisham et al
as 1:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ortega and Rebecca Scott
Defendant:
Governor of NM Michelle Lujan Grisham and NM Attorney General Raul Torrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Maldonado v. Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
as 2:2024cv00469
Petitioner:
Frankie Maldonado
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Toj-Riz v. Garland
as 24-9533
Petitioner:
SANTIAGO TOJ-RIZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
