Cases 31 - 40 of 99
Inforzato v. Jensen et al
as 2:2017cv00317
Plaintiff:
Michael Inforzato
Defendant:
Darren Jensen, David S. Manovich, Dave Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Izor v. Morales, et al
as 1:2017cv00900
Petitioner:
Garry E. Izor
Respondent:
Joe Morales and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garris v. Mayes County Jail et al
as 4:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
Robby Dean Garris
Defendant:
Mayes County Jail and Mitch Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Jensen et al
as 2:2017cv00141
Plaintiff:
Charles Baker
Defendant:
Darren Jay Jensen, Mark R. Jaggi, Michael A. Beindorff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hansen v. Jensen et al
as 2:2017cv00075
Plaintiff:
Rob Hansen
Defendant:
Darren Jay Jensen, Mark R. Jaggi, Michael A. Beindorff and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Lyall et al v. City of Denver et al
as 1:2016cv02155
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lyall , Garry Anderson , Thomas Peterson and others
Defendant:
City of Denver , Michael B. Hancock , Robert C. White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Bryant
as 5:2016cv00931
Petitioner:
Garry Randall West
Respondent:
Jason Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson, et al v. Los Lunas Community Program, et al
as 16-2172
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WALTER STEPHEN JACKSON, by his parents and next friends, Walter and Helen Jackson, STEVE NUNEZ, by his guardian and next friend, Mary Kathryn Reed, RON FULLER, by his mother and next friend, Josephine Boughton and others
Plaintiff Intervenor - Appellee:
JOHN E. YOUNG, IRIS YOUNG, legal guardians and paren of Rita Kay Young, DORA L. ROMERO and others
Scott v. USA
as 4:2016cv00413
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Garry Don Scott, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Scott v. USA
as 4:2016cv00397
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Garry Don Scott, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
