Cases 31 - 40 of 322
Williams v. Bunting et al
as 5:2021cv03078
Defendant:
B. Phralcornklen, (fnu) Coleman, (fnu) Griffith and others
Plaintiff:
Casey Lamont Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Department of Defense
as 5:2021cv03070
Defendant:
Department of Defense
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Winkel v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2020cv02610
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Winkel
Interested Party:
Social Security Regional Administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Knackstedt (ID 124682) v. Bunting et al
as 5:2020cv03264
Defendant:
(fnu) Hormell and Gary Bunting
Plaintiff:
Eric Shane Knackstedt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Douglas County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2020cv02520
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriff's Office, Jay Armbrister, Randy Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Douglas County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2020cv02522
Defendant:
Chase Reiling, Cory Roberson, Jay Armbrister and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2020cv02439
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Smith
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Penn-Star Insurance Company v. J&J Pilot Cars, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv02433
Defendant:
R&H Logistics, Inc., Gary Lee Plummer, J&J Pilot Cars, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Penn-Star Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Akers v. Flannigan et al
as 5:2020cv03225
Defendant:
Kathy S. Hill, Sarah Canty, Kathryn H. Vratil and others
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alford v. Buchholz et al
as 5:2020cv03196
Defendant:
(fnu) Hamm, Douglas County Jail, T. Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Trey Eric Alford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
