Cases 31 - 40 of 3,438
Wiggins v. Hatch, et al
as 24-2160
Defendant:
FNU MONTOYA, Unit Manager, DAVID GONZALEZ, Deputy Warden, ALISHA TAFOYA LUCERO, Secretary of Corrections; JOHN DOE, Director of Adult Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WIGGINS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Apodaca et al v. Gallegos et al
as 2:2024cv01077
Defendant:
FNU Cox/Cook, Megan Palla, Helen Casaus and others
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Ben Albert, Dr Victor Andrew Apodaca, Sr and Daniel Julian Acosta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiggins v. Hatch, et al
as 24-2159
Defendant:
DAVID GONZALEZ, Deputy Warden, D. JACKSON, Sergeant, FNU MARTIN, Unit Manager and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WIGGINS
Jones v. Comanche City of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2024cv01111
Defendant:
Comanche City of Oklahoma and Oklahoma Municipal Assurance Group
Plaintiff:
Clayton Phillip Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01116
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. United States Copyright Office and Patents
as 24-3158
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COPYRIGHT OFFICE AND PATENTS
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LEE JONES
Jones v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv01071
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ballard (PS) v. Schultz et al
as 1:2024cv02926
Defendant:
Cody Prentice, Travis Peck, Sarah Handcock and others
Plaintiff:
Danielle Elizabeth Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra - Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Davis (PS) v. Lepe
as 1:2024cv02882
Defendant:
Lepe, FCI Florence Special Housing Officers, Sandoval and others
Plaintiff:
Alexandre Zdenek Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
