Cases 31 - 40 of 3,863
Mullins v. Peacemaker et al
as 1:2024cv00915
Defendant:
Open-Rooter, LLC, Brandon K. Peacemaker and Rooter Town, LLC
Plaintiff:
Annmarie Mullins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lombard-Jackson (PS) v. Denver Police et al
as 1:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Kiki Lombard-Jackson and K. Kiki Lombard-Jackson
Defendant:
Denver Police, Norma Vasquez, Brian Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Saxena v. Jackson, et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff:
GRANT MITCHELL SAXENA
Defendant:
GARY M. JACKSON, MELISSA T. ANNIS, ZACHARY BANKS and others
Leigh v. Sims et al
as 5:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Chad K Leigh
Defendant:
Jerry Sims, Jr and Teamsters Local Union 886
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cosby v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1167
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent:
M. BANUELOS, DHO Officer, A. CIOLLI, Warden, J. POTTER, Correctional Officer and others
Lombard-Jackson (PS) v. Pacino
as 1:2024cv01110
Plaintiff:
Kiki Lombard-Jackson and K. Anonymous
Defendant:
Pacino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Workman v. United States Postal Service, et al
as 24-2033
Petitioner:
THOMAS WORKMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JASMINE MARTINEZ, ROBERT SALAS and others
Omar et al (PS) v. Diggins et al
as 1:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Ellu M. Omar, Demetrius M. Wallace, Jerren R. Pack and others
Defendant:
Diggins, Line, Bruning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
