Cases 31 - 40 of 123
Pinson v. Pacheco, et al
as 10-1576
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT PACHECO, SARA REVELL, MERRY WILNER and others
Pinson v. Pacheco, et al
as 10-1553
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT PACHECO, SARA REVELL, MERRY WILNER and others
Tuttamore v. Davis, et al
as 10-1524
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY TUTTAMORE
Defendant - Appellee:
BLAKE DAVIS, in his official and individual capacity, NALLEY, Regional Director, official and individual capacity, RANGEL, individual capacity and others
Stine v. Nalley
as 10-3293
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL K. NALLEY
Preacher v. George, et al
as 10-1500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUKE PREACHER, Sui Generis, Justice
Defendant - Appellee:
J. GEORGE, D.H.O. Officer, G. RAMIREZ, D.H.O. Officer, B.R. DAVIS, Warden and others
Radick v. USA et al
as 1:2010cv02504
Plaintiff:
Thomas Radick
Defendant:
USA, Harley Lappin, Federal Bureau of Prisons, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McIntosh v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2010cv02506
Plaintiff:
Richard S. McIntosh
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley G. Lappin, Joyce Conley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gambina v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2010cv02376
Plaintiff:
Ralph Gambina
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Richard Madison, Richard (I) Madison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gorbey v. Watts et al
as 5:2010cv03187
Plaintiff:
Michael Steven Gorbey
Defendant:
Harrell Watts, D. S. Dodrill, M. K. Nalley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mecham et al v. George et al
as 1:2010cv02269
Plaintiff:
Leonidas Ralph Mecham, Leroy Michael Schweitzer and Luke Ammon of Preacher
Defendant:
J. George, G. Ramirez, G. Bream and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
