Cases 31 - 40 of 45
London v. Hill et al
as 4:2011cv00028
Plaintiff:
Patrick Neil London
Defendant:
Eric J Hill, David A Foust, Joseph W Beaty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Raynor v. Wentz et al
as 6:2009cv00223
Plaintiff:
Linda Raynor
Defendant:
Bill Wentz, Cheryl Dickensheets, Dane Bayers and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Smelser v. Hough et al
as 5:2009cv00181
Plaintiff:
Neil G Smelser
Defendant:
Travis L Hough, Travis L Hough, Billings Town of and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Raynor v. Wentz et al
as 6:2009cv00053
Plaintiff:
Linda Raynor
Defendant:
Bill Wentz, Cheryl Dickensheets, Dane Bayers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson et al v. Pittsburg County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 6:2009cv00010
Plaintiff:
Neil Johnson, Steve E. Tripp, Steven W. Tripp and others
Defendant:
Pittsburg County Board of County Commissioners and Donald Mathis
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pope v. Carns
as 5:2008cv01306
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Neil Pope
Defendant:
Edwin Carns
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adair et al v. University of Tulsa, The et al
as 4:2008cv00201
Plaintiff:
David Adair, David Adair, David Adair and others
Defendant:
University of Tulsa, The, Eastern Oklahoma Orthopedic Center, Inc., T Jeffrey Emel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Meek v. Jones et al
as 5:2008cv00206
Petitioner:
Colin Neil Meek
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chermack v. Banther et al
as 5:2008cv00122
Plaintiff:
Neil R Chermack, Jr
Defendant:
Dennis Banther and Kingfisher County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
