Cases 31 - 40 of 139
Hudson v. Harvey et al
as 2:2016cv00568
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Hudson
Defendant:
FNU Harvey, FNU Mendoza, FNU Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romo v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2016cv01277
Plaintiff:
VIctor Manuel Bernal Romo
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Robert C. Tobias, District Attorney Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Coalition of Concerned Citizens to MakeARTSmart et al v. Federal Transit Administration of U.S. Dept of Transportation et al
as 1:2016cv00252
Plaintiff:
Coalition of Concerned Citizens to MakeARTSmart , 2706 Central Avenue LLC , Fox Plaza LLC and others
Defendant:
Federal Transit Administration of U.S. Department of Transportation , Anthony Foxx , Robert C. Patrick and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Perez v. Tapscott et al.
as 1:2016cv00602
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Perez
Defendant:
Robert C. Tapscott and Tapscott Group 401(K) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Byrum v. Glanz et al
as 4:2016cv00006
Plaintiff:
Terry Byrum
Defendant:
Stanley Glanz, Robert C Bates and Richard Weigel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. Glanz et al
as 4:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
Robbie Emery Burke
Defendant:
Stanley Glanz, Robert C Bates, Michael Huckeby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schwers v. Brack et al
as 1:2015cv01171
Plaintiff:
Clayton Andrew Schwers
Defendant:
Robert C Brack and William P Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Van Buskirk v. Colorado Department of Corrections
as 1:2015cv02321
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Van Buskirk
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Patton
as 15-7063
Petitioner - Appellant:
BOBBY JOE SMITH, II
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT C. PATTON
Cox et al v. Internal Revenue Service
as 5:2015cv01011
Plaintiff:
Robert C Cox and Deborah J Cox
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
