Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Hawkins v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 5:2009cv03226
Petitioner:
Harry Hawkins, Jr
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and Sheldon Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Powell v. Starman et al
as 1:2009cv01248
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Powell
Defendant:
Joe Starman, Independence House, All Staff and Contract Workers, Associates Affiledated with Indeendence House and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-3011
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Goodloe v. United States Parole Comm., et al
as 09-1017
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY GOODLOE
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and GARY K. WATKINS
York v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 09-3008
Petitioner - Appellant:
PERRY YORK
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Gabriel v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 08-1438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN PETER GABRIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Gabriel v. United States Parole Commission
as 1:2008cv01495
Plaintiff:
Julian Peter Gabriel
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Boling-Bey v. U.S. Parole Commission, et al
as 08-3166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLIVER BOLING-BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, PAMELA A. POSCH, Attorney, in her individual and official capacity, JEFFERY KOASTBAR, Examiner, in his individual and official capacity and others
David Cota v. United States Parole Commissio
as 08-1020
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID SALVADOR COTA
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Munn v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 5:2007cv01442
Petitioner:
John Warren Munn
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and H A Ledezma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
