Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Cope v. Bertas
as 1:2010cv02795
Plaintiff:
Peter Cope
Defendant:
Anthony Bertas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Izzy Poco v. Springdale, Town of et al
as 2:2010cv00559
Plaintiff:
Izzy Poco
Defendant:
Springdale, Town of, Joe Barker, Pat Cluff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cope v. USA
as 1:2009cv00059
Plaintiff:
Mary Cope and Mary Cope
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
McDaniel v City of Clovis et al
as 6:2009cv00297
Defendant:
City of Clovis, Clovis Police Department and Steve Cope
Plaintiff:
Clinton C. McDaniel
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McKown v. Cope et al
as 1:2008cv02756
Plaintiff:
Lorie Christine McKown
Defendant:
David Cope, Vail Resorts Inc. and Keystone Resorts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kirby v. Felcor TRS Borrower 1 LP et al
as 4:2008cv00235
Plaintiff:
Deidra Cope Kirby
Defendant:
Felcor TRS Borrower 1 LP, Felcor TRS Borrower GP 1, L.L.C., Felcor Lodging Trust, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Beneficial Investment v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 5:2008cv00360
Plaintiff:
Beneficial Investment, Michael Blair, Denise Blair and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
June, et al v. Union Carbide Corporation, et al
as 07-1532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY JUNE, SCOTT JUNE, individually and on behalf of the deceased YVONNE JUNE, GENE LYNN, individually and on behalf of the deceased, LUCILLE LYNN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, a New York corporation and UMETCO MINERALS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
Steen v. Serra
as 1:2007cv01004
Plaintiff:
Charles Augustus Steen, III
Defendant:
J. Tony Serra, Audrey Geisel, Karl Zobell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
