Cases 41 - 50 of 8,825
Hopper et al v. Weygand et al
as 4:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Keith-Dewane Hopper and Deanna-Lyn Dale
Defendant:
Jordan Weygand, Robert Glasby, Steven Kunzweiler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Nickols
as 24-5056
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GLENN DAVID NICKOLS, AKA Buck
Gutierrez et al v. Dona Ana County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Raymond Gutierrez, Sabrina Gutierrez, J. G. and others
Defendant:
Dona Ana County Board of Commissioners, Christopher Moreno, David Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tom v. Forbes & York Insurance LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01208
Plaintiff:
David Tom
Defendant:
Forbes & York Insurance LLC doing business as MedAdvantage Partners and Assurance Pivot, LLC, The doing business as SkyBridge Leads
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lombardi v. Prosecution and Code Enforcement Office, et al
as 24-1183
Plaintiff:
KIKI LOMBARDI, AKA K. Kiki Whitaker-Lombard
Defendant:
PROSECUTION AND CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE, West Colfax, DENVER PROBATION AND CASES, Case Level at Probation, DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE and others
Glaser (PS) v. World's Fair Capital LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01185
Plaintiff:
Douglas A. Glaser
Defendant:
World's Fair Capital LLC, Jason I. Russo, Jason (I) I. Russo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Simmington (PS) v. Gittins
as 1:2024cv01193
Petitioner:
David W Simmington, Jr.
Defendant:
G. Gittins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. Chenoweth
as 24-5050
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
FREEMAN DAVID CHENOWETH, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
