Cases 41 - 50 of 469
English v. MSPB, et al
as 23-9527
Petitioner:
LEONARD ENGLISH
Respondent:
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD and SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
English v. MSPB, et al
as 23-9528
Petitioner:
LEONARD ENGLISH
Respondent:
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD and SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
English v. MSPB, et al
as 23-9526
Petitioner:
LEONARD ENGLISH, JR.
Respondent:
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD and SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Olivas v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
Leonard John Olivas
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ratzloff v. Kansas Highway Patrol et al
as 2:2023cv02098
Plaintiff:
Kelly Ratzloff
Defendant:
Justin Dobler, Leonard Pelton, Jeremy A Cline and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Leonard v. Bridges
as 4:2023cv00055
Petitioner:
Don D Leonard
Respondent:
Scott Crow and Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saxena v. Jackson et al
as 1:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
Grant Mitchell Saxena
Defendant:
Gary M. Jackson, Melissa T. Annis, Zachary Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scharschell v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2022cv01252
Plaintiff:
Leonard Scharschell, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
Social Security Regional Administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bloomquist v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
Darrell Bloomquist
Defendant:
State of Utah, Leonard Isaacson, Mark Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
