Cases 41 - 50 of 420
United States v. Butler
as 23-8000
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ARNOLD DEVONNE BUTLER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00536
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
McMillan (ID 111775) v. Alexander et al
as 5:2022cv03278
Plaintiff:
Pettix McMillan
Defendant:
Byron Alexander, James Skidmore, (fnu) (lnu) (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melnick v. Williams, et al
as 22-1386
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HUNTER ADAM MELNICK
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN WILLIAMS, Executive Director of Prisons, in his official capacity, SARAH BUTLER, Dr., Chief of Psychiatry, in her individual and official capacities, CPO MITCHELL and others
Defendant:
POLIS, Governor and JOHN AND JANE DOES
Watts v. (lnu) et al
as 5:2022cv03195
Petitioner:
James Brent Watts
Respondent:
Lucifer (lnu), (fnu) (lnu) (1), (fnu) (lnu) (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv02229
Plaintiff:
Samantha Butler
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Veyhle v. Cressman et al
as 1:2022cv02054
Plaintiff:
Gene Neyhle and Gene Veyhle
Defendant:
Mark Cressman, Kevin Flores, Sierra Galindo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erwin (ID 123078) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2022cv03170
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Erwin
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Libby Keogh, Darcie Holthous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv03180
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
