Cases 41 - 50 of 291
Jackson v. Rankins
as 5:2023cv00439
Petitioner:
David L Jackson
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wulfert v. Duracell Inc et al
as 5:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
Chris Wulfert
Defendant:
Berkshire Hathaway Inc, Duracell Inc and MCC Management Group Inc doing business as Sleep Connection
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dalton v. Elliott et al
as 6:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Sharon Dalton
Defendant:
Chris Elliott, Blake Bode, Haley Longshore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDermott v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
David Bruce McDermott, II
Defendant:
Shannon Smith, Chris Hauger, Julie Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lesley v. Rankins
as 5:2023cv00171
Petitioner:
James Patrick Lesley
Respondent:
Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adair v. Rankin
as 4:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Adair
Defendant:
Chris Rankin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. McAlester Police Department et al
as 6:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Dondre C. Johnson
Defendant:
McAlester Police Department and Chris Skinner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hagen v. Girdner et al
as 6:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Charles David Hagen
Defendant:
TJ Girdner, Johnny Dallis, Mary Burlison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torrez v. Bayles et al
as 5:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Margarito Rios Torrez, Jr
Defendant:
Chris Bayles, Dennis Gay, Waurika County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
