Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Hynes v. Petkoff et al
as 1:2015cv00758
Plaintiff:
Cory Hynes and Kyler Livingston
Defendant:
Kiel Petkoff, Shane Musgrave, City of Steamboat Springs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jones v. Miller et al
as 1:2013cv02321
Plaintiff:
Ted Robert Jones
Defendant:
Sandra K. Miller, Sandra (I) K. Miller, Meagan Larsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Ducharme et al
as 1:2013cv01154
Plaintiff:
Cory Cooper
Defendant:
Art Ducharme, Art (I) Ducharme, Dave Booth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leal, et al., v. Paramount Restaurants Group, Inc., et al.,
as 1:2012cv03335
Plaintiff:
Rowdy Leal , Sigifredo Cisneros , Timothy L. Heider and others
Defendant:
Paramount Restaurants Group, Inc. , Strickland Restarurants, Inc. , Scratch Cookin, Inc. and others
Respondent:
Ron Lint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dd Fed. Question: Discovery Disputes
Solazzo v. Tenbrink et al
as 1:2012cv00649
Defendant:
Cory B. Tenbrink, Julie Marshall, Nancy L. Cohen and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew V. Solazzo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Boehner et al
as 1:2011cv03400
Plaintiff:
Trenton H. Parker
Defendant:
John Boehner, Nancy Pelosi, Dennis Hastert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Chafonte et al
as 1:2011cv02856
Plaintiff:
Ted Robert Jones
Defendant:
Chafonte, Daniel Abeyta, Cory Eshelman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Roth v. EasyStreetSports.com et al
as 1:2011cv02022
Plaintiff:
Cory Roth
Defendant:
EasyStreetSports.com, TheRX.com, Marty Jansen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
