Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Powell v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2010cv01448
Plaintiff:
David O. Powell
Defendant:
Ari (I) Zavaras, Ari Zavaras, Steve (I) Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunbar et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 4:2010cv00330
Plaintiff:
Marye Dunbar and Charles Dunbar
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hotton v. Dunbar et al
as 1:2010cv01152
Plaintiff:
Shane Hotton
Defendant:
George W. Dunbar, M. Ward and Susan Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saleh v. Dunbar, et al
as 10-1099
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER R. SALEH
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE DUNBAR and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL
Highline v. Zavaris et al
as 1:2010cv00171
Petitioner:
Nathan L. Highline
Respondent:
Ari Zavaris, George Dunbar and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blair v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2010cv00161
Plaintiff:
Jerry Blair
Defendant:
Aristedes Zavaras and George Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Key v. McLaughlin et al
as 1:2010cv00103
Plaintiff:
David Key
Defendant:
Scott (I) McLaughlin, Scott McLaughlin, Joe (I) Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Dunbar et al
as 1:2009cv02620
Petitioner:
Jesus Rodriguez
Respondent:
George Dunbar and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bang v. Dunbar et al
as 1:2009cv02478
Petitioner:
Kyle Douglas Bang
Respondent:
George Dunbar, Ari Zavaris and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
James v. Zavaris et al
as 1:2009cv02479
Petitioner:
Adrian James
Respondent:
Ari Zavaris, George Dunbar and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
