Cases 41 - 50 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv01297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
McGuirk v. Frontier Correctional Systems Inc et al
as 1:2012cv00123
Plaintiff:
David McGuirk
Defendant:
Frontier Correctional Systems Inc, Regional Juvenile Detention Center Inc and Tony Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Johnson, et al
as 12-6110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTOYA HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES JOHNSON and OKLAHOMA OFFICE OF JUVENILE AFFAIRS, ex rel. Central Oklahoma Juvenile Center
Defendant:
KIZZELL BROWN and BRANDY SMITH
Jennings v. Frontier Correctional Systems Inc et al
as 1:2012cv00055
Plaintiff:
Sharrid Jennings
Defendant:
Frontier Correctional Systems Inc, Regional Juvenile Detention Center Inc, Tony Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner et al v. Ute Indian Tribe et al
as 2:2012cv00210
Petitioner:
Edson Gardner, Lynda Kozlowicz and Konna C. Oviatt
Respondent:
Ute Indian Tribe, Ute Tribal Chairman, Ute Tribal Juvenile Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harris v. Brown et al
as 5:2011cv01386
Plaintiff:
Montoya Harris
Defendant:
Kizzell Brown , Brandy Smith , James Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rader v. Sedgwick County Juvenile Residential Facility et al
as 5:2011cv03149
Petitioner:
Cynthia Rader
Respondent:
Sedgwick County Juvenile Residential Facility and Derek Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramos v. Tooele Juvenile Court et al
as 2:2011cv00151
Plaintiff:
Michael Ramos
Defendant:
Tooele Juvenile Court , DCFS , Lynn Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
