Cases 41 - 50 of 184
Lamar Advertising Southwest, Inc. v. Grandview Realty, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00230
Defendant:
Smith and Aguirre Construction, Inc. and Grandview Realty, LLC
Plaintiff:
Lamar Advertising Southwest, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Leensvart et al
as 1:2021cv00434
Plaintiff:
Lamar Delray Davis
Defendant:
Edward S. Leensvart, E. Thomas, Edmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamar Central Outdoor LLC et al v. Department of Transportation
as 5:2020cv01194
Plaintiff:
Lamar TLC Properties Inc and Lamar Central Outdoor LLC
Defendant:
Department of Transportation
Intervenor:
Hearts for Hearing Foundation
Cross Claimant:
City of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steele v. Topeka, Kansas, City of et al
as 5:2020cv03244
Defendant:
Jared Strathman, Devin Veirgerver, Ryan Tolbert and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar R. Steele, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. L4 Construction LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00509
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Perez
Defendant:
L4 Construction LLC and Matt Lamar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Davis v. Ivey et al
as 1:2020cv01212
Defendant:
Robert Ivey, R. Duran, P. McCarl and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar Delray Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rushing v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00022
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lamar Rushing
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Standifer v. Kieser et al
as 2:2020cv02005
Defendant:
Bobby Hall, Travis Holcomb, Samuel Meers and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lamar Standifer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hakeem v. Lamar
as 1:2019cv01026
Respondent:
Sylvia Lamar
Petitioner:
Shannon Hakeem and Shannon J. Hakeem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams-Berrien v. Wilson, et al
as 19-1378
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID WILSON, ROBERT PETREE, ROBERT PETREE, individually and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERICK LAMAR WILLIAMS-BERRIEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
