Cases 41 - 50 of 189
Aposhian v. Garland, et al
as 23-4141
Plaintiff / Appellant:
W. CLARK APOSHIAN
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States of America, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THOMAS E. BRANDON, Acting Director, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 - Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Conchas-Bustos v. Garland
as 23-9594
Petitioner / Appellant:
EUSTAQUIO CONCHAS-BUSTOS
Respondent / Appellee:
MERRICK GARLAND
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 - Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Young v. Garland, et al
as 23-1293
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK GARLAND, Atty. Gen., MICHAEL HOROWITZ, O.I.G., DEPT. OF H.H.S. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
