Cases 51 - 60 of 184
Oklahoma City City of v. 100 Foot Wide Continuous Extended Term Easement and right-of-way for public utility water pipelines et al
as 5:2020cv00027
Defendant:
Pamela A Yager, Ruth E Harder, James G Bishop and others
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma City City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Mirll v. University of Central Oklahoma et al
as 5:2019cv01143
Defendant:
Charlotte Simmons, Darla Sherman, University of Central Oklahoma and others
Plaintiff:
Teresa Mirll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole, et al v. Goossen, et al
as 19-3196
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL FAFLICK, KATIE SULLIVAN and JONATHAN T. COLE
Defendant / Appellee:
DUANE GOOSSEN, in his official capacity as Secretary of Administration, SHERMAN JONES, Superintendent of Kansas Highway Patrol and TOM DAY, in his official capacity as Legislative Administrative Services Director
Roberts v. Laramie County District Court Judge et al
as 2:2019cv00084
Defendant:
Laramie County District Court Judge, State of Wyoming Senior Appellate Counsel, State of Wyoming Assistant Public Defender and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon D'Narro Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seals v. Morellano
as 4:2019cv00200
Respondent:
Rick Morellano
Petitioner:
Glenn Sherman Seals, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
v. Goossen
as 5:2019cv04027
Defendant:
Tom Day, Sherman Jones and Duane Goossen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cole et al v. Goossen et al
as 5:2019cv04028
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Faflick, Jonathan T Cole and Katie Sullivan
Defendant:
Sherman Jones, Tom Day and Duane Goossen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Seals v. Morellano
as 5:2019cv00180
Respondent:
Rick Morellano
Petitioner:
Glenn Sherman Seals, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Seals v. Parker et al
as 4:2019cv00100
Respondent:
Tulsa County Detention Ctr, Vic Regalado and David Parker
Petitioner:
Glenn Sherman Seals, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
