Cases 51 - 60 of 160
Laintz v. Correctional Health Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv02122
Defendant:
John Simmers, Streyle, Garnes and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Laintz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carl v. State of Utah et al
as 1:2018cv00090
Defendant:
Weber County, Davis County, FNU Dawson and others
Undetermined:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Plaintiff:
Shane R. Carl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carl v. State of Utah et al
as 1:2018cv00077
Undetermined:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Defendant:
Troy S. Rawlings, Glen R. Dawson, State of Utah and others
Plaintiff:
Shane R. Carl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guttenberg et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 1:2018cv01274
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Howell, Holly Sanborn, Kenneth Hickman and others
Defendant:
Buckeye Fire Equipment Co., Kidde PLC, Inc, Kidde-Fenwal, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dawson v. Lengerich et al
as 1:2018cv01112
Defendant:
Jason Lengerich, Coleman, David Lisac and others
Plaintiff:
James Ralph Dawson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 1:2018cv01070
Plaintiff:
Edward Czapla, Nathan Ownby, Rita Westcott and others
Defendant:
UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc., The 3M Company, Buckeye Fire Equipment Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t
Dawson v. Rios et al
as 5:2017cv01311
Plaintiff:
Richard Dawson, Jr
Defendant:
Hector Rios, Ademola Aderagba, FNU James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis v. GEO Corrections et al
as 5:2017cv00903
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Defendant:
GEO Corrections, Amber Martin, FNU Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
