Cases 51 - 60 of 764
McMiller v. Jones, et al
as 14-6103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HENRY MCMILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC, TRACY MCCOLLUM, Warden, FNU BORNHEIM and others
Dopp v. Jones, et al
as 14-6088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD LYNN DOPP
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, JOHNNY BLEVINS, RANDY KNIGHT and others
Brown v. Parker, et al
as 14-7023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID L. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
SARAH PARKER, Records Officer for the Oklahoma Department of Corrections, EMMA WATTS, Warden for the Oklahoma Department of Corrections, JIM RABON, Sentence Administrator for the Oklahoma Department of Corrections and others
Starr v. Officer Kober, et al
as 14-6074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL PAUL STARR
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER KOBER, correctional officer, SERGEANT BASHEAR, SERGEANT HAUNG, grievance officer and others
Miller v. Scott, et al
as 14-7016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR CORNELL MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
WADE SCOTT, O.S.P. Chaplain, ROBERT COMPTON, O.S.P. Food Service Superintendent, D. D. JOHNS, O.S.P. Food Service Supervisor and others
Gonzalez v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv00291
Plaintiff:
Margarita Gonzalez
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Justin Jones, Millicent Newton-Embry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Adams. v. Jones, et al
as 14-6059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLER ADAMS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, DON SULTMILLER, Chief Medical Officer, GENESE MCCOY, Medical Administrative Review Auth and others
Peevy v. Jones
as 5:2014cv00195
Petitioner:
Lucky Kelly Peevy
Respondent:
Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peevy v. Jones
as 4:2014cv00081
Petitioner:
Lucky Kelly Peevy
Respondent:
Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cottriel v. Jones, et al
as 14-6037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JON ANDREW COTTRIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director
Defendant:
EDWARD EVANS, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
