Cases 51 - 60 of 2,424
Workman v. United States Postal Service, et al
as 24-2033
Petitioner:
THOMAS WORKMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JASMINE MARTINEZ, ROBERT SALAS and others
Rich v. Ceiss et al
as 5:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
JT Rich
Defendant:
Cortnie Ciess, Jerry Hurburger, Cheyenne Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Benavidez v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00188
Petitioner:
Ernesto J Benavidez
Respondent:
Ronald Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. State of New Mexico et al
as 2:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Richard Ralph Martinez
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, Governor of the State of New Mexico, New Mexico Parole Chairperson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benson v. Thomas et al
as 1:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Regan Benson
Defendant:
Ron Thomas, Mark Fleecs, Jason Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robertson v. Robertson
as 2:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Belinda Robertson
Defendant:
Cale Robertson, Melanie Rhodes, Jill J Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Martinez v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Tristan Holly Martinez
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
