Cases 51 - 60 of 717
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Loveless v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2022cv00994
Petitioner:
Chris Elroy Loveless
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of and Jason M Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burnett v. Pettigrew et al
as 5:2022cv00993
Petitioner:
Johnny William Burnett
Respondent:
Luke Pettigrew and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pendergraft v. Oklahoma Attorney General's Office et al
as 5:2022cv00985
Plaintiff:
Mark A Pendergraft
Defendant:
Oklahoma Attorney General's Office, Lauren Ray-Morales, Dixie Coffey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wisdom Ministries, Inc. v. Garrett et al
as 4:2022cv00477
Plaintiff:
Wisdom Ministries, Inc.
Defendant:
Allison D Garrett and Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Loveless v. Peek et al
as 5:2022cv00941
Plaintiff:
Chris Elroy Loveless
Defendant:
Jim Peek, Jason M Hicks and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blanchard v. Oklahoma State
as 5:2022cv00902
Petitioner:
James Robert Blanchard
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richards v. Whitten
as 5:2022cv00880
Petitioner:
Jerry L Richards
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of and Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bolin v. Oklahoma, State of
as 6:2022cv00282
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Bolin
Defendant:
Oklahoma, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Blanchard v. Oklahoma State
as 4:2022cv00424
Petitioner:
James Robert Blanchard
Respondent:
Oklahoma State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
