Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 105
USA v. Springer
as 1:2013cv00838
Defendant: Cefton A Springer
Plaintiff: USA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Jump et al v. Springer Municipal Schools et al
as 1:2013cv00289
Plaintiff: Clinton Jump and Isabel Armijo
Defendant: Springer Municipal Schools , Forrester Elementary School , Gregg McMann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Springer v. USA
as 4:2013cv00145
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Lindsey Kent Springer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Springer v. West et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv01127
Plaintiff: Jonna Lou Springer
Defendant: Brian West and Dave Goldman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Springer v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2012cv00315
Plaintiff: Kelly Springer
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Tate v. Takeda Industries, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00722
Plaintiff: Steven Tate
Defendant: Takeda Industries, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company and Springer Clinic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Springer v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv02606
Plaintiff: Monte Springer
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Interested_party: SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00839
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv00369
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States, et al v. Springer
as 11-5053
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: LINDSEY K. SPRINGER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?