Cases 61 - 70 of 389
Kyte v. Mayes et al
as 1:2022cv02392
Plaintiff:
Megan Kyte
Defendant:
Steve Mayes and Oregonian, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Williams v. Saint Francis Health System, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00390
Plaintiff:
Kenna Williams, Tabitha Barber, LaVette Brooks and others
Defendant:
Saint Francis Health System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Kyte v. Republic of Ireland et al
as 1:2022cv02185
Plaintiff:
Megan Kyte
Defendant:
Republic of Ireland and Delegation of European Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aschenbrenner v. Ring et al
as 1:2022cv02132
Plaintiff:
Jeff Aschenbrenner
Defendant:
Megan Ring, Brian Mason, Richard Reigenborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borowski v. Ring et al
as 1:2022cv02087
Plaintiff:
Matthew Michael Borowski
Defendant:
Megan Ring, Brian Mason, Richard Reigenborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. VanGilder et al
as 1:2022cv02045
Plaintiff:
Nicholas John McDonald
Defendant:
VanGilder, Megan Bibliowicz, Lawrence Templeton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kyte v. King
as 1:2022cv01912
Plaintiff:
Megan Kyte
Defendant:
Joey King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham v. Ring et al
as 1:2022cv02506
Plaintiff:
Paul Graham
Defendant:
Megan Ring, Brian Mason, Richard Reigenborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia et al v. Ring et al
as 1:2022cv01803
Plaintiff:
Reagan Garcia, Paul Graham, Theodore Welker and others
Defendant:
Megan Ring, Brian Mason, Richard Reigenborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
