Cases 61 - 70 of 75
Sundance Services, Inc. v. Roach et al
as 1:2010cv00110
Plaintiff:
Sundance Services, Inc. and Sundance Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Donna Roach, Kelly Roach, Michael Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Posselli v. May et al
as 2:2010cv00139
Plaintiff:
Brett Posselli
Defendant:
Louis May, Robbie May, Jason Roach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith, et al v. Roach
as 10-6000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS LEON SMITH and BRUCE CLYDE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL ROACH, United States Marshall
Smith, et al v. Roach
as 09-6238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS LEON SMITH and BRUCE CLYDE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL ROACH, United States Marshal
Fulcher, et al v. City of Wichita, et al
as 09-3301
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOMMY E. FULCHER, GLENDELL HENDERSON, JESSE L. HILL, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF WICHITA, Police Department and NORMAN WILLIAMS, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police
Smith et al v. Roach
as 5:2009cv01085
Plaintiff:
Dennis Leon Smith and Bruce Clyde Smith
Defendant:
Michael W Roach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Roach v. Creek County Sheriff et al
as 4:2009cv00419
Petitioner:
Bobby Wayne Roach
Respondent:
Creek County Sheriff and Tulsa County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Estrada et al v Dona Ana County Detention Center et al
as 1:2009cv00392
Plaintiff:
Tomas Estrada, James Carroll and Frank Wilson
Defendant:
Dona Ana County Detention Center, J. Hughes, Fnu Roach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richardson v. Roach, et al
as 5:2009cv00340
Plaintiff:
Earnest Richardson
Defendant:
Michael Roach, John Whetsel and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Richardson v. Roach et al
as 5:2009cv00340
Plaintiff:
Earnest Richardson
Defendant:
Michael Roach, John Whetsel and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
