Cases 61 - 70 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv01147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rollins v. Potomac House, et al
as 10-6272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY JAMES ROLLINS
Defendant - Appellee:
THE POTOMAC HOUSE APARTMENTS and D&S PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT, INC.
Rollins v. Atwood et al
as 5:2010cv01010
Plaintiff:
Tony James Rollins
Defendant:
Jessica Atwood, Marcus Williams, Daniel Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Daniels-McDaniel v. Winder et al.
as 2:2010cv00727
Plaintiff:
Tyrone V. Daniels-McDaniel
Defendant:
James M. Winder, Scott Carver, Rollin Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Winder et al
as 2:2010cv00650
Plaintiff:
Arthur Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
James M. Winder, Scott Carter, Rollin Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beauchaine v. Winder, et al
as 10-4029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS BEAUCHAINE
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES M. WINDER, Sheriff, individually and in official capacity, ROLLIN COOK, Chief, individually and in official capacity, MIKE THOMAS, Lieutenant, individually and in official capacity and others
Rollins v. Town of Haskell
as 09-7094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SONJA ROLLINS, Personal Representative of the Estate of Harland Rollins, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF HASKELL, a political subdivision of the State of Oklahoma
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bay et al v. Salt Lake County et al
as 2:2009cv00752
Plaintiff:
Michael Bay and Jennifer Bay
Defendant:
Salt Lake County, Salt Lake County, Salt Lake County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
