Cases 71 - 80 of 493
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5070
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Joseph Holdings, LLC v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma
as 1:2022cv01948
Plaintiff:
Joseph Holdings, LLC, d/b/a Clearer Technology, Joseph Holdings, LLC doing business as Clearer Technology and Gabriel S. Joseph, III
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co.KG
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Fairchild v. Elliot et al
as 1:2022cv01894
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gabriel Fairchild
Defendant:
Frank "Pete" Elliot, Gordon D. Sanchez, Raymond Tomsick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armijo v. Adams County et al
as 1:2022cv01847
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Armijo
Defendant:
Adams County, Sheriff Richard Reigenborn, Nichole Durante and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Burress v. Elliot et al
as 5:2022cv00500
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Burress
Defendant:
Ray Elliot, FNU Gardener, FNU Engle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. U.S. Government, The et al
as 1:2022cv01517
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Glen Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Government, The and Johnson Family
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Espinoza v. Detone et al
as 1:2022cv01429
Plaintiff:
Joseph Espinoza
Defendant:
Gabriel Detone, Zach Moore, Melissa Leamon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3102
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
