Cases 71 - 80 of 101
Hill v. Miller, et al
as 14-1008
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALBERT B. HILL
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MILLER, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Medicine-Blanket v. Miller, et al
as 14-1005
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES G. MEDICINE BLANKET
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MILLER, Warden, C.C.C.F. and JOHN W. SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Harper v. Fitzgibbons et al
as 1:2014cv00019
Plaintiff:
Gerald Scott Harper
Defendant:
Patrick Fitzgibbons, Joshua Sundberg, David McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Faircloth v. Ciolek et al
as 1:2013cv03096
Plaintiff:
James Faircloth
Defendant:
Anne Ciolek, Anne (I) Ciolek, Michael (I) Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fogle v. Miller et al
as 1:2013cv02759
Petitioner:
Ronald Jennings Fogle
Respondent:
Michael Miller, Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Miller
as 1:2013cv02656
Petitioner:
Alvin Smith
Respondent:
Michael Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Miller
as 1:2013cv02081
Petitioner:
Alvin Smith
Respondent:
Michael Miller and John S. Suter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fogle v. Miller et al
as 1:2013cv01938
Petitioner:
Ronald Jennings Fogle
Respondent:
Michael Miller and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallin v. Miller et al
as 1:2013cv01868
Petitioner:
Donald Oloyea Wallin
Respondent:
Michael Miller and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medicine-Blanket v. Miller et al
as 1:2013cv01795
Plaintiff:
Charles Medicine-Blanket
Defendant:
Michael Miller and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
