Cases 71 - 80 of 137
Spears et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2014cv00700
Plaintiff:
Valerie Spears , Terrie Phelps and Bobbie Phelps
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Phelps v. USA
as 5:2014cv04054
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Frederick D. Phelps, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Phelps v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 5:2014cv00208
Plaintiff:
William C Phelps
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Myers v. Hummel et al
as 1:2014cv00446
Plaintiff:
Bernard K. Myers
Defendant:
Dorwin Dwayne Hummel, Sally A. Myers, Sally (I) A. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps v. Lane et al
as 5:2014cv00049
Plaintiff:
Markeese Krea Shawn Phelps
Defendant:
Reece Lane, Oklahoma State of and John TV.com
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Spears, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 13-6291
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KATHY JOHNSON, MELISA JOHNSON, NANCY KNIBB and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Johnson & Johnson, et al v. Spears, et al
as 13-609
Petitioner:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC.
Respondent:
VALERIE SPEARS, MANORAMA MAHAJAN, KATHY JOHNSON and others
Bradley v. Jensen et al
as 2:2012cv00988
Plaintiff:
Victor Bradley
Defendant:
David Jensen, Steve Turley and Rusty Phelps
Not Yet Classified:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Spears et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2013cv00846
Plaintiff:
Valerie Spears , Manorama Mahajan , Kathy Johnson and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
